🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in other member states